21 research outputs found
Building Bridges Between Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century and Regulatory Decision-making Through Interactive Web Applications
Risk assessments and regulations are informed largely from animal studies, which are low throughput, costly, and time consuming. Gathering toxicity data for decisions on the large number of chemicals manufactured and used in commerce is a difficult task for current goals in chemical testing and safety decisions. Alternative approaches include computer models informed by existing toxicity data and computational toxicology like high throughput screening (HTS). Aggregating the large quantity of data produced through alternative methods is a difficult task with large gaps between the analysis and interpretation. The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Interactive Chemical Safety for Sustainability (ICSS) Dashboard project seeks to close the gap by enabling stakeholders, including decision-makers, to easily access and visualize Iomputational toxicology data from USEPA's Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) project. The iCSS Dashboard is a web application that allows users to subset both HTS assays and chemicals to a manageable set for clearer visualization of the data, so the data is more accessible for understanding how computational toxicology can be applied to meet current goals in toxicity testing, screening, and risk assessments for chemical safety decision-making.Master of Science in Public Healt
INTEROPERABILITY IN TOXICOLOGY: CONNECTING CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND COMPLEX DISEASE DATA
The current regulatory framework in toxicology is expanding beyond traditional animal toxicity testing to include new approach methodologies (NAMs) like computational models built using rapidly generated dose-response information like US Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) and the interagency collaborative Tox21 initiative. These programs have provided new opportunities for research but also introduced challenges in application of this information to current regulatory needs. One such challenge is linking in vitro chemical bioactivity to adverse outcomes like cancer or other complex diseases. To utilize NAMs in prediction of complex disease, information from traditional and new sources must be interoperable for easy integration. The work presented here describes the development of a bioinformatic tool, a database of traditional toxicity information with improved interoperability, and efforts to use these new tools together to inform prediction of cancer and complex disease. First, a bioinformatic tool was developed to provide a ranked list of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) to gene associations based on literature support, enabling connection of complex diseases to genes potentially involved. Second, a seminal resource of traditional toxicity information, Toxicity Reference Database (ToxRefDB), was redeveloped, including a controlled vocabulary for adverse events used to map identifiers in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), thus enabling a connection to MeSH terms. Finally, gene to MeSH associations were used to evaluate the biological coverage of ToxCast for cancer to understand the capacity to use ToxCast to identify chemical hazard potential. ToxCast covers many gene targets putatively linked to cancer; however, more information on pathways in cancer progression is needed to identify robust associations between chemical exposure and risk of complex disease. The findings herein demonstrate that increased interoperability between data resources is necessary to leverage the large amount of data currently available to understand the role environmental exposures play in etiologies of complex diseases.Doctor of Philosoph
Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments
BACKGROUND: Although the implementation of systematic review and evidence mapping methods stands to improve the transparency and accuracy of chemical assessments, they also accentuate the challenges that assessors face in ensuring they have located and included all the evidence that is relevant to evaluating the potential health effects an exposure might be causing. This challenge of information retrieval can be characterized in terms of "semantic" and "conceptual" factors that render chemical assessments vulnerable to the streetlight effect. OBJECTIVES: This commentary presents how controlled vocabularies, thesauruses, and ontologies contribute to overcoming the streetlight effect in information retrieval, making up the key components of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) that enable more systematic access to assessment-relevant information than is currently achievable. The concept of Adverse Outcome Pathways is used to illustrate what a general KOS for use in chemical assessment could look like. DISCUSSION: Ontologies are an underexploited element of effective knowledge organization in the environmental health sciences. Agreeing on and implementing ontologies in chemical assessment is a complex but tractable process with four fundamental steps. Successful implementation of ontologies would not only make currently fragmented information about health risks from chemical exposures vastly more accessible, it could ultimately enable computational methods for chemical assessment that can take advantage of the full richness of data described in natural language in primary studies. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6994
ToxCast Data Expands Universe of Chemical-Gene Interactions
Presentation at Society of Toxicology meeting March 201
New Features in ToxRefDB to Improve Modeling Applications and Data Integration
Presented at the 2018
SOT annual meeting in San Antonio, TX
ToxRefDB v2.1: update to curated in vivo study data in the Toxicity Reference Database
The Toxicity Reference Database (ToxRefDB) contains in vivo study data from over 5,900 guideline or guideline-like studies for over 1,100 chemicals. The database includes information regarding study design, chemical treatment, dosing, treatment group parameters, treatment-related (significantly different from control) and critical (adverse) effects, guided by a controlled effect vocabulary, as well as endpoint testing status according to health effects guideline requirements. ToxRefDB v2.1 is an update to address a compilation error found in ToxRefDB v2.0 that resulted in some effects being inadvertently omitted from the database. Though effect data has been recovered, no new studies were added. The recovered data improves the utility of ToxRefDB as a resource for curated legacy in vivo information, which enhances scientific confidence in vitro high-throughput screening of chemicals and supports retrospective and predictive toxicology applications for which outcomes in traditional regulatory toxicology studies serve as reference information
Recommended from our members
BCScreen: A gene panel to test for breast carcinogenesis in chemical safety screening.
Targeted gene lists have been used in clinical settings to specify breast tumor type, and to predict breast cancer prognosis and response to treatment. Separately, panels have been curated to predict systemic toxicity and xenoestrogen activity as a part of chemical screening strategies. However, currently available panels do not specifically target biological processes relevant to breast development and carcinogenesis. We have developed a gene panel called the Breast Carcinogen Screen (BCScreen) as a tool to identify potential breast carcinogens and characterize mechanisms of toxicity. First, we used four seminal reviews to identify 14 key characteristics of breast carcinogenesis, such as apoptosis, immunomodulation, and genotoxicity. Then, using a hybrid data and knowledge-driven framework, we systematically combined information from whole transcriptome data from genomic databases, biomedical literature, the CTD chemical-gene interaction database, and primary literature review to generate a panel of 500 genes relevant to breast carcinogenesis. We used normalized pointwise mutual information (NPMI) to rank genes that frequently co-occurred with key characteristics in biomedical literature. We found that many genes identified for BCScreen were not included in prognostic breast cancer or systemic toxicity panels. For example, more than half of BCScreen genes were not included in the Tox21 S1500+ general toxicity gene list. Of the 230 that did overlap between the two panels, representation varied across characteristics of carcinogenesis ranging from 21% for genes associated with epigenetics to 82% for genes associated with xenobiotic metabolism. Enrichment analysis of BCScreen identified pathways and processes including response to steroid hormones, cancer, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA damage and breast cancer. The biologically-based systematic approach to gene prioritization demonstrated here provides a flexible framework for creating disease-focused gene panels to support discovery related to etiology. With validation, BCScreen may also be useful for toxicological screening relevant to breast carcinogenesis
ToxRefDB 2.0: Improvements in Capturing Qualitative and Quantitative Data from in vivo Toxicity Studies
Presented at the Annual Society of Toxicology meetin
Recommended from our members
BCScreen: A gene panel to test for breast carcinogenesis in chemical safety screening.
Targeted gene lists have been used in clinical settings to specify breast tumor type, and to predict breast cancer prognosis and response to treatment. Separately, panels have been curated to predict systemic toxicity and xenoestrogen activity as a part of chemical screening strategies. However, currently available panels do not specifically target biological processes relevant to breast development and carcinogenesis. We have developed a gene panel called the Breast Carcinogen Screen (BCScreen) as a tool to identify potential breast carcinogens and characterize mechanisms of toxicity. First, we used four seminal reviews to identify 14 key characteristics of breast carcinogenesis, such as apoptosis, immunomodulation, and genotoxicity. Then, using a hybrid data and knowledge-driven framework, we systematically combined information from whole transcriptome data from genomic databases, biomedical literature, the CTD chemical-gene interaction database, and primary literature review to generate a panel of 500 genes relevant to breast carcinogenesis. We used normalized pointwise mutual information (NPMI) to rank genes that frequently co-occurred with key characteristics in biomedical literature. We found that many genes identified for BCScreen were not included in prognostic breast cancer or systemic toxicity panels. For example, more than half of BCScreen genes were not included in the Tox21 S1500+ general toxicity gene list. Of the 230 that did overlap between the two panels, representation varied across characteristics of carcinogenesis ranging from 21% for genes associated with epigenetics to 82% for genes associated with xenobiotic metabolism. Enrichment analysis of BCScreen identified pathways and processes including response to steroid hormones, cancer, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA damage and breast cancer. The biologically-based systematic approach to gene prioritization demonstrated here provides a flexible framework for creating disease-focused gene panels to support discovery related to etiology. With validation, BCScreen may also be useful for toxicological screening relevant to breast carcinogenesis
Chemical-Gene Interactions from ToxCast Bioactivity Data Expands Universe of Literature Network-Based Associations
Presented at the Annual Society of Toxicology meetin